Is there, or isn’t there, seaweed in Lululemon clothes?

Is there, or isn’t there, seaweed in Lululemon clothes?

Subscribe to Outside+ now to get unique access to all of our content, including sequences, instructor tips, video lessons, and much more. An investigation by the New York Times of a Lululemon T-shirt made of VitaSea, a fabric allegedly derived from seaweed, revealed that “there was no substantial difference in mineral levels between the VitaSea fabric and cotton T-shirts,” according to the newspaper’s story on Wednesday. Finally, on Friday, following contact from Canadian regulators, Lululemon decided to remove all claims of therapeutic advantages from their VitaSea clothing line, which is sold in the country at this time.


Lululemon to remove claims from seaweed clothing line

Lululemon announced on Friday that it will comply with a ruling by Canada’s Competition Bureau and remove any statements about the health benefits of seaweed from a line of garments that the company sells. Lululemon announced on Friday that it had agreed to comply with a ruling by Canada’s Competition Bureau and that it would delete all claims from a range of garments that claimed seaweed had health advantages. According to the regulatory agency, the Vancouver-based yoga-wear retailer will immediately remove all tags and other product notices that make “unsubstantiated” claims about therapeutic or performance benefits from a line of clothing that it claims is infused with seaweed from its website and stores.

After The New York Times published a piece contradicting the company’s claims about the composition of its VitaSea product line earlier this week, the garment manufacturer came under criticism from consumers.

As Andrea Rosen, acting deputy commissioner of competition, put it, “These allegations.

“In collaboration with the Competition Bureau of Canada, we are revising the labeling on our VitaSea items sold in our Canadian stores to eliminate references to the therapeutic and performance features of the VitaSea technology.” “It is crucial to highlight that the bureau has no objections to the material content as specified on our care and content labels, which are available upon request.

Independent testing has shown that the VitaSea fabric contains vitamins, minerals, and amino acids, according to the results of the testing.” “The therapeutic qualities mentioned on all product hang tags,” Meers stated, adding that the business will conduct an investigation.

Company disputes newspaper claim

Lululemon’s stock price fluctuated on Friday after the firm disputed a newspaper’s assertion that the fabric did not include seaweed, according to CNBC. On the Toronto Stock Exchange, the stock ended the week down 30 cents at $40.50, while on the New York Stock Exchange, the stock ended the week up 24 cents at $41.74US. “We stand by our goods and our methods, and we categorically deny any assertions made in recent press stories to the contrary,” Meers said in a statement released Thursday evening.

  1. The Times of London commissioned a laboratory to examine the clothing’s composition.
  2. The New York Times said that it had the Lululemon clothes analyzed after an investor who is shorting the company’s shares had the clothing tested and provided the results to the newspaper.
  3. Smartfiber AG is a subsidiary of the Smartfiber Group.
  4. 14 and found that its ingredients were exactly as described in the product description.

Lululemon stock submerged by seaweed-wear doubts

OTTAWA, Canada (Reuters) – Lululemon Athletica’s stock has taken a turn for the worst among investors. After a news story questioned the trendy fitness wear retailer’s claims that the fabric of some of its clothes includes beneficial seaweed, LULU.OLLL.TOstock reopened on Thursday, a day after it closed on Wednesday. In this March 31, 2006 file picture, a buddha statue greets customers as they enter Lululemon Athletic, a yoga apparel store in San Francisco, California. A woman walks her dog through the store while she shops.

  1. After a news story questioned the trendy fitness wear retailer’s claims that the fabric of some of its clothes includes beneficial seaweed, LULU.OLLL.TOstock reopened on Thursday, a day after it closed on Wednesday.
  2. The company has come under fire since the report was published.
  3. In trading on Thursday, Lululemon shares slid more than 6 percent to $41.50 per share on the Nasdaq, and around 5 percent to $40.80 per share on the Toronto Stock Exchange.
  4. Lululemon claims that its Vitasea clothing is created in part with SeaCell, a seaweed-based fabric that, when in touch with moisture, releases amino acids, minerals, and vitamins into the skin, according to the company.
  5. Smartfiber AG, a German firm, manufactures the SeaCell.
  6. Lululemon has also said that Smartfiber audits its manufacturing, according to Gray’s comment on the subject.

In addition, she stated that “management is recognizing returns but has no intentions to remove them from the shelf.” Lululemon and its investor relations department did not reply to Reuters’ queries, although a public relations agency working on behalf of the business published a statement late on Wednesday evening.

“All of our goods, including our Vitasea fabric, are subjected to rigorous testing, which has been in place for more than a year.

Lululemon might “apologize” and refund or swap the clothing, or it could give compensation, according to Tal Woolley, an analyst at RBC Capital Markets.

($1 equals $0.98 Canadian) Susan Taylor contributed reporting, and Peter Galloway edited the piece. for-phone-onlyfor-tablet-portrait-upfor-tablet-landscape-upfor-desktop-upfor-wide-desktop-up

Lululemon says tests confirm seaweed content claim

OTTAWA, Canada (Reuters) – Independent testing have proven that the VitaSea apparel sold by trendy yoga wear shop Lululemon AthleticaLLL.TOLULU.O includes beneficial seaweed, a claim that has been called into doubt this week. In this March 31, 2006 file picture, a buddha statue greets customers as they enter Lululemon Athletic, a yoga apparel store in San Francisco, California. A woman walks her dog through the store while she shops. Chief Executive Officer, Reuters/Kimberly White/Files According to Robert Meers, CEO of Lululemon, a New York Times piece on lab tests that contradicted the company’s claims about seaweed content has not affected sales or revenue, but has instead been distracting.

  • An investor who “shorts” a stock is wagering that the stock will decline in value.
  • “I believe it would make me feel worse if no one cared.” On Friday, following initial falls, the stock rose 76 cents on the Nasdaq to $42.26 and gained 31 Canadian cents to C$41.11 on the Toronto Stock Exchange, both of which were positive.
  • When the seaweed fiber comes into touch with moisture, according to Lululemon, it releases amino acids, minerals, and vitamins into the skin.
  • It has stated that it is giving an exchange on VitaSea items to any consumers who are disappointed, and that it now intends to concentrate on expansion goals and the forthcoming Christmas shopping season.
  • The fact that many individuals, unfortunately, jumped to conclusions diverted their attention away from the issue.
  • Meers and Chief Financial Officer John Currie talked to over 25 analysts and key investors in the meanwhile, providing an overview of the company’s testing and quality control systems.
  • “Even if you manage a firm with honesty, individuals will fabricate stories to forward their agenda from time to time,” says the CEO.
  • Vitamins, minerals, and amino acids were detected in the fabric used by Lululemon, according to the results of the tests.
  • According to a news release from Smartfiber, SeaCell is permanently included into the spun fiber that the company offers to Lululemon.

($1 equals $0.97 Canadian) Susan Taylor contributed reporting, and Rob Wilsonfor-phone edited the piece. -onlyfor-tablet-portrait-upfor-tablet-landscape-upfor-desktop-upfor-wide-desktop-up

The long, strange history of Lululemon Athletica Inc, North America’s weirdest clothing brand

A recent price increase for the company’s popular women’s yoga pants has enraged consumers, who have taken to social media to express their outrage. This leads them to believe that the corporation is trying to sneak in an unwarranted price rise. Although this advertisement has not yet been loaded, your article continues below it. Normally, this wouldn’t be considered breaking news. That being said, we’re talking here about Lululemon, the yoga apparel business that has built a cult-like consumer following to match its cult-like workplace culture.

Did you know that the company’s name was chosen because the founder feared that Japanese people would be unable to pronounce it correctly?

Or both?

Lululemon pants are getting more expensive, and customers are furious

Customer outrage has erupted when Lululemon slashed the pricing of its renowned women’s yoga pants in recent weeks. There are many who suspect that the corporation is trying to sneak in an unwarranted price rise. Even if this advertising hasn’t fully loaded yet, your article will continue underneath it. A normal person would not consider this newsworthy. That being said, we’re talking here about Lululemon, the yoga clothing business that has built a cult-like consumer following to match its cult-like workplace culture.

Was it ever brought to your attention that the company’s name was chosen because the founder felt Japanese people would have difficulty pronouncing it?

Founder Chip Wilson is an Ayn Rand fan, and the Vancouver-based company takes its values from “Atlas Shrugged.”

Late in 2011, the firm began printing the words “Who is John Galt?” on their shopping bags, which became a popular marketing tool. Galt, of course, is the protagonist of Ayn Rand’s classic “Atlas Shrugged,” which argues that the unfettered pursuit of one’s own interests should be the ultimate aspiration of a civilized society. Wilson first read the novel when he was 18 years old (the company has since removed its web page about Galt.)

Wilson thinks the birth-control pill and smoking are responsible for high divorce rates — and the existence of Lululemon.

Wilson once wrote the following regarding the roots of his company: Women’s life began to alter almost quickly. Men were baffled as to how to interact with the new female. As a result, the era of divorce began. The rise of divorce and increased public awareness of equality led to women in the 1970s and 1980s becoming known as ‘Power Women.’ Women were persuaded by the media that they could be successful at home and compete on an equal footing with men in the workplace. Women put in 12-hour work days, tried to keep their homes clean and organized, and gave their children all of the affection they had given them before the divorce.

The 1980s heralded the arrival of Power Women who dressed like men in boardroom attire complete with large shoulder pads.

Breast cancer became more well-known in the 1990s as well as earlier decades.

After all was said and done, Lululemon was founded because female education levels, breast cancer awareness, yoga/athletics, and the desire to appear feminine all coincided at the same moment.

Since the above article was initially published, the corporation has deleted Wilson’s name from a large number of its online sites.

Wilson created the name Lululemon because he thinks Japanese people can’t say the letter “L.”

Upon being asked about his thoughts on the Japanese pronunciation of the company’s name, he responded by telling National Post magazine, “It’s interesting to see them attempt to speak it.” The following was written by him in 2009 (in a blog post that has since been deleted): “It was assumed that a Japanese marketing agency would not attempt to establish a North American-sounding brand using the letter “L” because the sound does not exist in Japanese phonetics.” It was hoped that by having a “L” in the name, the Japanese customer would recognize the name as being natively North American and authentically so.

See also:  Book Review of Jeffrey Armstrong's Karma

In essence, the term “lululemon” has no origins and implies nothing more than the fact that it contains three letters “L.” There is nothing more or less to say.

Wilson said he favoured using child labour in developing countries.

According to individuals who attended the BALLE BC conference, Wilson told the attendees that third world children should be allowed to work in factories since it offers them with much-needed income. LululemonCanada’s The Tyee reported: In addition, they claim that he suggested that even in Canada, there is a place for street adolescents between the ages of 12 and 13 to find work in local industries as an alternative to collecting handouts. “I look at it in the same way that the Globe Trade Organization does, which is that the single most effective method to share prosperity across the world is for poor nations to lift themselves out of poverty,” Wilson told The Tyee in an interview.

Wilson is one of those people who refers to himself in third person.

He posted the following blog entry about himself when he first started out: Chip believed that the distributor had paid a premium for the “L,” therefore he set himself the goal of coming up with a name for his new firm that had three “Ls.” After we initially became aware of the post, the firm removed it. It has subsequently been reused in this location.

The ideal customer at Lululemon is “a 32-year-old professional single woman named Ocean who makes $100,000 a year.” Here she is:

Lululemon Athletica / Facebook Ocean is also “engaged, has her own apartment, travels, is trendy, and has an hour and a half to work out every day,” according to Wilsontold, who previously spoke to The New York Times.

Wilson once suggested in a Bloomberg TV interview that some women’s bodies “just don’t actually work” for his yoga pants. “They don’t work for some women’s bodies … it’s really about the rubbing through the thighs, how much pressure is there over a period of time, how much they use it.

YouTube/lululemon More information about that catastrophic Bloomberg TV interview may be found here. Wilson’s board of directors then urged him not to participate in any further media interviews.

Some believe working at Lululemon is like being in a cult. This Lululemon staffer wrote on the company blog about a naked yoga session she attended.

The Lululemonnaked yoga blog article may be found here. “It’s the first time I’ve heard of somebody virtually directly utilizing the strategies of cults and applying them to their business,” Douglas Atkin, author of The Culting of Brands, told Fast Company in an interview.

Lululemon employees are not just being friendly. They’re gathering data on you.

Read the Lululemonnaked yoga blog article in its whole here. It is the first time I’ve heard of somebody virtually directly employing the strategies of cults and applying them to their business, said Douglas Atkin, author of The Culting of Brands, in an interview with Fast Company.

Wilson believes employees should ask their bosses this creepy question about surviving shipwrecks:

“A shipwreck has left 12 individuals stranded on a desolate island.” There is only one boat that can accommodate six people, and if those six individuals work together flawlessly, they have a ten percent chance of surviving.

The people who have been left behind will die. “Would you accept me, and if so, why? If not, what makes you think you won’t?”

In 2007, Lululemon falsely claimed its clothes were made with seaweed.

Wilson contended in his discussion of ” The Secret ” on his business blog that disease was primarily a result of one’s choices. He stated that “wellness invites health.” Sickness attracts other sick people. Stress is associated with 99 percent of all illnesses, according to one of the company’s corporate mantras.

And if your life isn’t “great,” then that’s your fault too.

As Kellogg Wilson says again and over again: “Greatness is desiring the finest of everything and doing whatever is necessary to obtain it. Greatness entails having demanding friends who expect the best, demanding the best wife or husband, and wanting the best work with the finest compensation. Greatness necessitates that the firm for which you work produces the greatest goods and is unwavering in its commitment to its clients. Greatness necessitates the highest level of performance from oneself.

In 2012, Wilson resigned as chief innovation and branding officer.

Lululemon The corporation would not specify if the decision was related to the slew of unfavorable headlines Wilson has garnered in recent weeks. He remained in his position as chairman. Christine Day, the company’s CEO, has taken up his responsibilities (pictured). Wilson went on to make a $14 million investment in a tea firm.

In March 2013, The company sold some faulty pants that became see-through if you did the “downward dog” yoga position. It took 6 per cent off the stock.

Lululemon / Flickr / Creative Commons

The strategic difficulty was Lululemon’s dependence on a single supplier for its stretchy Luon material.

It has been reported by Quartz that Luon cloth is only produced by a single Taiwanese producer. Using a single supplier helps guarantee that Lululemon’s manufacturing expertise does not spread too broadly, but it also increases the danger of faulty shipments negatively impacting sales success.

These are the pants in question: Lululemon’s incredibly popular $98 “Astro” line. They’re comfortable and stylish enough to be worn outside the gym.

Blisstree, which also covered the Lululemon/Calvin Klein story.

Lululemon’s success has inspired imitators. Dear Kate launched a line of yoga pants that can be worn safely with no underwear in 2014, shortly after the see-through debacle.

BI Greetings, KateCEO A wicking, stain releasing, and leak resistant fabric is used in Julie Sygiel’s items, according to the designer. “Silky soft, patent-pending fabric” is used in her products, according to Julie Sygiel.

Lululemon then recalled more than 318,000 women’s tops due to dangerous hoodie drawstrings.

Lululemon Athletica / Facebook Duke is named after one of Wilson’s sons, who was also called Duke. He’s 35 years old and describes himself as a “athletic opportunist.” He likes surfing in the summer and skiing in the winter, among other things. Duke earns more money than Ocean and is ready to pay a premium for superior quality.

In 2015, amid surging sales, Lululemon introduced these “anti-ball-crushing pants” for men.

Lululemon The following was mentioned by one reviewer: “They are the most comfy pants I have ever worn.” They can be used in a variety of situations. They are versatile and may be worn up or down.”

Some men thought the logo on the trousers — normally associated with women — was off-putting.

Lululemon According to one consumer, “I just got a new pair of underwear today (without realizing they had changed their previous underwear) and it is dreadful!” “They have a cheap feel about them, and the new ‘pouch’ is really uncomfortable.”

Lululemon has also tried luring men in with its own beer …

Sign up to have the most important articles from the Financial Post, a part of Postmedia Network Inc., sent to your inbox every day. Your agreement to receive the aforementioned newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. is obtained by clicking on the sign up button.

You may unsubscribe from our emails at any time by clicking on the unsubscribe link included at the bottom of each email we send. The Postmedia Network, Inc. is located at 365 Bloor Street East in downtown Toronto, Ontario, and may be reached at 416-383-2300.

Thanks for signing up!

A welcome email has been sent to you. It’s possible that you’ve accidentally deleted it. Please check your garbage folder. Your mailbox will soon be flooded with the latest edition of Financial Post Top Stories. There was a problem when we tried to sign you up. Please try your search again.

Notice for the Postmedia Network

Cookies are used on this website to customise your content (including advertisements) and to analyze traffic on the website. More information about cookies may be found here. The fact that you are continuing to use our site indicates that you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Secrets Lululemon Doesn’t Want You To Know

We use cookie technology on our website to customise your content (including advertisements) and to evaluate how visitors use our site. Cookies are discussed in further detail here. The fact that you are still using our site indicates that you accept our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Lululemon ditches tags touting health benefits

Following concerns expressed by the federal Competition Bureau, Lululemon Athletica has decided to withdraw statements about the health advantages of its seaweed-fibre garments. Following several days of criticism for the Vancouver-based yoga wear firm, which was sparked by a newspaper piece that called into question the clothing’s health benefits and if it really included traces of seaweed minerals and nutrients, the company announced its decision yesterday. Until it can provide scientific evidence that the statements are correct, Lululemon, a fast-growing company that has been a stock market darling since going public in the summer, has agreed to remove the tags with the claims or cover them with a sticker.

  • The high-end retailer is attempting to capitalize on the growing interest among consumers in all things organic.
  • We just want to ensure that when companies make these types of claims, they have scientific testing available to back up their assertions, she explained in an interview with the Associated Press.
  • The VitaSea apparel, according to the labels, “releases marine amino acids, minerals, and vitamins into the skin when it comes into touch with moisture.” The Bureau of Labor Statistics is not the only federal agency that has expressed alarm.
  • The health and safety of Canadians is ensured by having items promoted in the country that make health claims be verified by Health Canada, according to a spokeswoman for the organization.
  • Smartfiber AG, a German-based business that manufactures the seaweed fiber, known as SeaCell, is currently retesting the Lululemon seaweed shirts, according to him.

Meers, “I don’t believe we’re in a crisis because I believe Smartfiber has provided us with enough verbal affirmation that I don’t believe we’ll be surprised by anything.” Since Wednesday, when a New York Times piece raised concerns about the chain’s VitaSea line of shirts, Lululemon has been at the center of the controversy.

They fell again on Thursday and finished yesterday at $40.50, down 30 cents from the previous day.


The regulatory body, on the other hand, wants the merchant to provide evidence to support “unsubstantiated” health claims.

As part of the agreement, Lululemon promised to “immediately” notify store managers and staff – referred to as “educators” by the company – that they were not to disclose information on VitaSea’s “therapeutic advantages and performance claims.” Specifically, she stated that the Bureau is investigating health claims made by other firms.

  • The assertions were deleted from the tags by the corporation.
  • Meers stated that the seaweed dispute had had no effect on sales at Lululemon’s 70 locations in Canada and the United States.
  • SeaCell is one of a number of so-called eco-fabrics that have gained popularity among fashion designers and apparel manufacturers in recent years.
  • The same way Smartfiber does, several other fiber manufacturers claim that their product has health advantages.

“We sell a product that has a unique behavior, and as a result, we rigorously evaluate our product,” he explained further.

Lululemon’s ex-CEO wrote an outrageous “unauthorized” history of the brand. Here’s what we learned.

As a result of concerns made by the federal Competition Bureau, Lululemon Athletica is withdrawing claims about the health advantages of their seaweed-fibre apparel. Following several days of criticism for the Vancouver-based yoga wear firm, which was sparked by a newspaper piece questioning the health benefits of the apparel and if it really included traces of seaweed minerals and nutrients, the company announced its decision yesterday. Until it can provide scientific evidence that the statements are correct, Lululemon, a rapidly expanding company that has been a stock market darling since going public in the summer, has agreed to remove the tags with the claims or cover them with a sticker.

  1. The high-end retail company is attempting to capitalize on consumers’ growing interest in all things organic by charging a premium for its merchandise.
  2. “We simply want to make sure that when they are making these sorts of claims, that they have scientific studies available that would corroborate those claims,” she explained in an interview.
  3. If the VitaSea apparel comes into touch with moisture, the tags state, “it releases marine amino acids, minerals, and vitamins into the skin.
  4. Also getting involved in the seaweed fiber saga is the Canadian Food Inspection Agency, which has requested that Lululemon provide scientific evidence to back its assertions.
  5. According to Robert Meers, chief executive officer of Lululemon, the company will take “corrective” action – most likely by concealing the statements on its product tags with stickers – until it is able to provide the study.
  6. According to Mr.
  7. The stock of Lululemon was pummeled on the Toronto Stock Exchange for much of the day on Wednesday before regaining some of its ground.
See also:  Refresh from the Inside Out: Spring Yoga, Ayurveda, Health Tips

As a result of the Times’s commission, a laboratory examination of a Lululemon shirt revealed that there was no “substantial difference in mineral levels between VitaSea fabric and cotton T-shirts.” The garment that was examined was labeled as being comprised of 24% seaweed fiber, 70% cotton, and 6% spandex, according to the manufacturer.

  • Rosen stated that the Bureau is satisfied that the VitaSea shirts contain the amount of seaweed fiber that the company states.
  • As part of the settlement, Lululemon has agreed to delete any references to VitaSea technology from its Web site and in-store marketing.
  • This past August, it filed a lawsuit against an Ontario firm called Sunveil Sunwear, which claimed that their clothes offered greater UV protection than it actually did.
  • Lululemon’s 70 stores in Canada and the United States, according to Mr.
  • The ruling of the Bureau of Consumer Protection does not apply to the retailer’s 30 locations in the United States.
  • Many designers are insisting on organic fabrics produced from seaweed, bamboo, soybean, and corn, which are available from most major clothing manufacturers who offer a “green line.” Many additional fiber manufacturers, including Smartfiber, claim that their products have health advantages.
  • Gerhard Neudorfer, the marketing director for SeaCell at Smartfiber, stated in an interview this week that the business evaluates textiles created with its product to ensure that the health claims are accurate.

As he put it, “We sell a product that has a unique behavior; as a result, we thoroughly evaluate our product.”

Lululemon was made to make women’s butts look good

Wilson sold his former snowboarding equipment company, Westbeach Snowboard, in 1997 and was residing in Vancouver at the time of his first yoga session. Wilson has been practicing yoga since 1997. As a result of his participation in triathlons, he had been experiencing back pain and decided to take an exercise class at a nearby gym. Wilson said that the teacher was dressed in garments from a dance gear firm, which were thin and flimsy in appearance. “I was certain that if I could solve the transparency problem, fix the camel-toe issue, and thicken the fabric to cover any defects, I would be able to produce the ultimate sports clothing for women,” he says.

  1. During this time period, companies such as Adidas and Nike were employing the “shrink it and pink it” strategy in order to convert men’s sports clothes into merchandise that could be sold to women.
  2. Wilson goes on to say: Guests would feel and look beautiful in our attire because we emphasized what made them feel confident — larger shoulders, smaller waists, thinner hips — by emphasizing what made them feel confident.
  3. There was a great deal of discussion on where to place the seam lines on pants.
  4. Moving the side seams to the back would frame the bum and make it seem smaller, which is exactly what I was going for!
  5. Wilson also specifies that “the lighting would be ideal, and each room had to include a three-way mirror so a lady could be self-critical of her behind” when it comes to the design of Lululemon stores.

Lululemon was created for “Super Girls”

Wilson changes his mind on who Lululemon was designed for during the course of the book. His initial remarks are positive, praising the opportunity to outfit those who regularly practice yoga. However, he goes on to ridicule the yoga community, calling the Yoga Journal a “mediocre journal languishing in the depths of the granola world.” He further claims that Lululemon was spurred by “rich women” who were able to “‘purchase’ time in their life and were, as a result, frequently in excellent physical and mental health.” The fact that the brand was created for a very specific sort of client, whom he refers to as “Super Girls,” is made very plain by the author.

They were the offspring of “Power Women,” a group Wilson describes as a “female market segment in the 1970s and 1980s” who were divorced, a phenomenon Wilson attributes to the increased use of birth control in the 1970s and 1980s.

Besides being on the road for work and pleasure, she also had a condo and was the owner of a cat. She was well-dressed and had the means to purchase high-quality items.”

Wilson came up with the name Lululemon because he believed it would attract Japanese people

For years, there has been widespread speculation that Wilson created the name Lululemon because he felt it would be amusing for him to listen to Japanese people say it, and this is something that is brought up in the book. Among the names and logos Wilson suggests are Athletically Hip, which he came up with after brainstorming 20 alternatives (the stylized A of the Lululemon logo comes from this original business name). His next story is about selling the name of a skateboard company, Homless Skateboards, to Japanese buyers for a large sum of money because he believed “Homless” was a desirable brand name: “It appeared that the Japanese liked the name Homless because it contained the letter L, and the Japanese language does not contain that sound.” To Japanese customers, especially those under the age of 22, brand names with Ls in them sounded even more genuinely North American/Western than those without.” Further, he explains how he “played about with alliterative names that had the letter L in them,” la la la, “jotting down variations in my notebook,” until he came up with the name “Lululemon.” Despite the fact that Wilson does not directly state that he devised this name in order to exploit Japanese buyers or cause them to stumble, Wilson does make fun of Japanese tourists who fly to Canada and purchase Roots clothing elsewhere in the book.

“Trendy Clothing for Rich Japanese Tourists,” read the tagline on Lululemon’s first advertisement, which featured a photo of three girls wearing glasses and a Roots sweatshirt.

Wilson had a vendetta against soda

One thing Wilson makes clear in his book is that Lululemon is not intended for those who use large amounts of soda. Initially, he declared that “Coke, Pepsi, and other pops would come to be regarded as the smokes of the future,” which was written in shops and on Lululemon’s iconic red shopping bags — the corporate “manifesto,” which he acknowledges was made up of “random things about my life.” The consumption of colas does not replace the consumption of water. “Colas are just another low-cost medicine that has been made to seem appealing by marketing.” The line was removed from the manifesto only after a Lululemon employee pointed out that the line made the company appear dated, since soda was not associated with health in the first place (though Wilson writes that he “wanted our Super Girl market to know that the Lululemon brand was not for soda drinkers”).

Wilson also claims that Coca-Cola and Pepsi “threatened to drown Lululemon in lawsuits,” but he does not elaborate.

Wilson only wanted to hire people who want children

Lululemon “screened for people who wanted to start families,” according to Wilson, when it came to hiring. The company’s success was dependent on family values, he argues, but he also doesn’t see anything wrong with imposing his own restricted definition of relationships and family on others. Specifically, he adds, “we want for our people to find the right partner, for individuals to have children, and for the family nucleus to serve as an energy generator.” Wilson also added the following phrase in his original manifesto: “Just as you didn’t know what an orgasm was until you had one, nature doesn’t let you know how wonderful children are until you have them.” “Children are the greatest pleasure in life.” Lululemon first employed a sort of employee he refers to as “Balance Girls,” who were “type-A Wall Street personalities,” but the firm was forced to fire them because they were “doing 14-hour days in finance, were not dating, and could see no possibilities for marriage or children.”

The stores have an extremely particular rule of how to talk to customers

Wilson’s depiction of how he built the company has some dictatorial tendencies throughout the book, with particular guidelines for how staff should approach goal-setting and living a healthy lifestyle. Probably the most notable example is his 6/13 rule. This was a mathematical formula that dictated how and when store staff, or “Educators,” as they were known, could interact with consumers. “If a Guest looked at a product for six seconds, an Educator had a thirteen-second opportunity to teach them on the item,” according to the guideline.

On March 28, 2014, a Lululemon class was taking place inside a shop in London.

Whitby/Getty Images

The brand has a long history of controversy

During his Bloomberg interview, in which he stated that Lululemon pants were not suitable for ladies whose thighs rub together, Wilson claims that the newspaper manipulated his remarks and presented them out of context. ) For the record, Bloomberg did not single out that particular segment of the conversation, although Wilson did state that “it’s really about the rubbing of the thighs.” He also maintains that Luon, the proprietary fabric used for Lululemon leggings, which many people have complained about pilling after many washes, didn’t pill because of poor quality, but rather because women were being forced into sizes that were too small for them to wear.

  1. Wilson claims that the media is entrenched in dramatic reporting and that he has no responsibility for the behavior of offended women.
  2. that made the shirts anti-stink, as well as moisturizing for the person wearing it” and that “the shirts were anti-stink, as well as moisturizing for the person wearing it.” The Times newspaper revealed test findings showing that the apparel did not include any seaweed in its particles.
  3. He claims he “felt horrible for Nike” and that he agrees with the company’s position on the allegations.
  4. If a child was not “school material” in Asia, he or she learnt a skill and made a contribution to their family’s income.
  5. “I enjoyed the alternate more than the original.” Wilson brags that in order to reply to the Nike story, he chose to turn the entire thing into a joke on the internet.
See also:  5 Yogic Tips for Boosting Energy

Another passage from the book indicates that “stores built tongue in cheek windows that expressed their disapproval of a contentious political or social point of view.” During the opening of the brand’s first store in Vancouver, he placed an advertisement in the newspaper offering free garments to anyone who turned up to the store nude.

A large number of people responded, including those who he said “couldn’t have been older than fourteen.” The attention generated by this form of publicity, according to Wilson, is “worth millions of dollars and so much more fun than a normal press release.”

Lululemon’s $12 headbands are actually just scraps

Lululemon’s founder, Wilson, attempts to portray an image of inventiveness in his story of how the company expanded its yoga gear offerings beyond women’s leggings. The founder of Lululemon, Chip Wilson, says that when hunting for the best sort of material that would eventually become the company’s $68 yoga mats, he dug through the garbage of a supplier to uncover the location of a source of materials in Asia. Anecdote number two describes how Wilson observed scraps of fabric being discarded inside factories and tried to come up with creative uses for them: “One of the seamstresses used to take the ends of the pants she cut off and wear it as a headband because her hair got in her eyes while she was sewing,” Wilson writes.

Take these pants ends and put them on the market!'” Wilson goes on to explain that headbands became one of the brand’s most popular things as a result of “young girls who utilized them to separate themselves among a sea of school uniform.”

Clothes you don’t have to wash are on the rise. Are they really better for the environment?

The past few years have been particularly fruitful for those who despise doing laundry. A flurry of new businesses have entered the market, each guaranteeing that you may wear their items for days, weeks, even months at a time without having to wash them. Mercero wool button-downs from WoolPrince, who launched a Kickstarter campaign in 2013, raised ten times their initial target of $30,000 by boasting that their merino wool button-downs could be worn for 100 days straight. Hundreds of sports apparel businesses, including Lululemon and Patagonia, use nanosilver particles to treat garment products to combat odor, according to the company.

  1. Pangaia’s cotton and seaweed fiber tee, which has been treated with antimicrobial peppermint oil to prevent odor for the fourth time, is on my back as I type this.
  2. There are at least a half-dozen reasons why we should wash our clothes less frequently.
  3. The frequency with which you wash your clothes reduces the life of your clothes by fading the colors and straining at the seams.
  4. We wash synthetic clothes, and when we do, plastic microfibers are washed out, making their way past water treatment facilities and into our rivers and seas.
  5. Water and energy are consumed during the washing of clothes, especially when using hot water.

According to Levi’s most recent lifecycle assessment of its jeans, the consumer phase accounts for up to 40% of the climate impact and 23% of the water used over a pair’s lifetime, despite the fact that a German study discovered that the amount of water used to grow cotton exceeds the amount of water a consumer will use to wash a cotton piece by a much greater margin.

In addition to wasting your time and money, dry cleaning your dress shirts exposes the environment, dry cleaners, and perhaps you to a carcinogenic and neurotoxic material known as PERC, which is still used by 70 percent of dry cleaners in the United States.

A T-shirt from Unbound Merino costs $65 and costs ten dollars more than similar shirts from Lululemon.

Pangaia outperforms the competition, charging only $85 for a white T-shirt.

Alternatively, you might just opt to wash your clothes less frequently. Let’s move beyond the anecdotal consumer test and dig into the scientific evidence for a moment.

The science of smelly polyester

Rachel McQueen, an associate professor in the Department of Human Ecology at the University of Alberta, has had a whiff of a lot of soiled T-shirts in her time. The interaction between the microbiome of our skin and our clothing is the subject of her research, and she explains that while sweat itself is sterile and odor-free (unless you’ve just eaten a lot of garlic), as soon as it comes into contact with our body’s bacteria — which differs from person to person — it is metabolized into volatile, gaseous compounds that float to our noses.

Companies that market their clothing as odor-fighting, whether through the use of silver particles woven into the fabric, a finish of triclosan or triclocarban, or the use of fabrics such as bamboo rayon, merino wool, or saltwater seaweed fibers, almost always attribute the odor-fighting ability to the fabric’s supposed antimicrobial properties.

  1. It is true that germs may continue to feed on your sweat and develop smells after they have boarded your yoga tank, so integrating antimicrobial elements into your clothes should, in principle, be advantageous.
  2. The type of cloth has an impact on this decision.
  3. The drawback is that they attract the oily molecules that generate body odor, which is a bad thing.
  4. into the polyester.” You may find yourself pulling out a purportedly clean exercise tank from your drawer and wrinkled up your nostrils because of the accumulation of these substances over time.
  5. That’s why cotton becomes so drenched with sweat when you’re exercising.
  6. Bing!
  7. Furthermore, merino wool dries more rapidly than cotton, making it an excellent choice for sports wear.
  8. The benefits of wearing merino wool include the fact that it does not require washing every time you workout.

Outlier, a company that develops apparel for guys who commute by bike to work, offers a merino wool tee. Smartwool’s raison d’être is to provide merino wool clothing and accessories, albeit their goods are geared more toward hiking than anything else.

Is silver really anti-microbial, and does it matter?

The regrettable conclusion reached by McQueen’s research is that silver is not as successful at destroying germs in the real world as it is in laboratory studies. “I always seem to get myself into problems,” she moans. “Some corporations don’t like me because I express skepticism about the finishes applied to polyester fabrics. Regardless, I’m open to it; I’ve simply not come across it yet.” In a 2016 study published in Norway, researchers stitched samples of a range of materials to gym mats that were used by 30 sweating participants in a 90-minute circuit-training session.

  1. Following treatment, the treated polyester materials did, in fact, smell less foul than the untreated polyester fabrics did.
  2. Polyester treated garments smelled better than cotton after laundry, but they smelled worse than wool after laundering.
  3. Conclusion: If you’re adamant about wearing polyester or nylon exercise gear (and we understand why; it looks far nicer than cotton gym shorts), a silver treatment may be able to assist avoid the development of a persistent sweat odor.
  4. The Organic Basics brand offers silvertech clothes.
  5. A formidable anti-odor team, according to the theory, might be formed by mixing natural fibers and silver powders.
  6. But hold on a minute!
  7. There is also some fear that when you sweat, these particles are taken into your circulation — although it is difficult to determine whether they do so at high enough quantities to be harmful.
  8. Because of a mysterious proprietary coating known as Filium, Ably Apparel claims that their men’s and women’s cotton essentials are stain- and odor-resistant.

In my experience, after wearing one of their T-shirts multiple times each week for a year of hard travel, I can confirm that the anti-stain guarantee appears to be true: my white T-shirt lasted 14 months without picking up a single permanent stain of any type, including yellowing beneath the sleeves.

What about the smell? It would form after a day on the plane, but it could be ventilated out and was always rinsed right out with soap and water.

Controlling odor the natural way

A more environmentally friendly and cost-effective technique may be to simply hang your garments outside in the sunshine to destroy any leftover germs and allow the air to carry away any odorous substances. Vintage buyers swear by spraying vodka or vinegar on their treasures to get rid of the odor of former owners’ clothing and furnishings. It’s important to remember that all of the study done so far has focused on odor caused by underarm odor rather than odor caused by feminine discharge (hmm, how would I phrase this?

The experience of a few of brave female Buzzfeed workers who tried out Organic Basics underwear for a week demonstrates this argument perfectly.

Yes, the majority of these brands are geared at guys.

In terms of increasing the amount of merino in my wardrobe, I’m definitely intrigued.

Everyone can just chill out

Finally, keep in mind that, more than likely, no one can smell you as strongly as you can. “There is a concern over odor in our house,” McQueen explains. I’ll admit that this is a little anecdotal, but it’s something that has grown through the years of dealing with dirty T-shirts that other people have worn.” Prospective volunteers are screened at McQueen’s research lab, where they are looked for in t-shirts that preserve their body odor. And many folks (as well as their flower-fresh shirts) are left out of the running.

“I’ve had a buddy tell me, ‘Oh my gosh, this is my stinky T-shirt,’ which made me laugh.

And I think to myself, ‘Seriously?'” Having a specific problem with body odor might signal that you have a combination of bacteria in your armpits that produces an exceptionally unpleasant stink.

But what about the vast majority of people?

In the end, you don’t have to buy washless apparel in order to reduce the amount of time you spend washing your clothes.

Really, all you have to do is attempt to buy things made of natural fibers rather than synthetic fibers and hang them up when you’ve finished using them.

You’ll discover that you may get three or four wears out of your garment before having to wash it. Join the Goods newsletter mailing list now! We’ll deliver you the most interesting Goods articles twice a week, investigating what we purchase, why we buy it, and why it matters to us.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *